The Secret Name

In the Hebrew language, the word name carries the same connotations that it does in English. It can mean the label given to objects and people (“The name of Abram’s wife was Sarai.”); a person’s reputation (“A good name is to be chosen rather than great riches.”); or a person’s authority (“And he wrote in the name of King Ahasuerus.”). But it also takes on one additional connotation: it represents the person’s character (“Holy and awesome is His name.”). In fact, a person’s name is the person himself. To blaspheme God’s name (Lev. 24:11) is to blaspheme God. To worship God’s name is to worship God.

The Egyptians took it one step further. They believed that a person’s name was an integral part of his being. Where we might say that a man consists of his body, soul, and spirit, an ancient Egyptian would say that a man consists of his body, name, and ka (double). An inscription inside the tomb of Pepi I sees the king in his afterlife going “forward with his flesh, Pepi is happy with his name, and he liveth with his ka.” Indeed, it was impossible to live without a name. They believed that “a man only came into being upon this earth when his name had been pronounced” and that “the future life could only be attained after the gods of the world beyond the grave had become acquainted with it and uttered it.”

This belief applied to the gods as well. According to one creation story, when the creator god Neb-er-tcher began to create everything, he said, “I brought (i.e., fashioned) my mouth, and I uttered my own name as a word of power, and thus I developed myself out of the primeval matter which had evolved multitudes of evolu­tions from the beginning of time.” According to The Book of the Dead, the sun god Re (or Rā) was “the creator of the name[s] of his limbs, which came into being in the form of the gods who are in the following of Rā.” As E.A. Wallis Budge, the late Keeper of the Egyptian and Assyrian Antiquities in the British Museum, noted, “From this we see that all the ‘gods’ of Egypt were merely personifications of the NAMES of Rā, and that each god was one of his members, and that a name of a god was the god himself” (The Gods of the Egyptians, Vol. 2, 1904).

Conversely, blotting out a person’s name was the same as destroying that person. If anyone wished to destroy the evil power of a demon, then, in some cases, all one had to do was to make a wax figure of the demon, write its name on the figure and then destroy the figure, thereby destroying its name which was its power. To the Egyptians, therefore, the name was a real, dynamic, active, even life-giving (or life-taking) force and was thus a source of great power.

Knowing this makes it easy to see why the Egyptians came to believe that if one retained a magical or secret name, a name which no one else knew, then one retained a source of power which no one else had. However, should someone happen to learn your secret name, then that person held that power over you and could make you do whatever he or she desired. Again, this belief also applied to the gods. Each god had a secret name. Should a person happen to learn the secret name of a god, then the god would be forced by the power of magic to do whatever that person desired whenever that person spoke the name.

In a story which is a part of an Egyptian magic spell designed to counteract scorpion poison, Re is described as “abounding in names, unknown to that (god) and unknown to this (god).” Later in the story, Re himself says, “My father and my mother told me my name, (but) it was hidden in my body before I was born, in order that the power of a male or female magician might not be made to play against me.” The goddess Isis, who was especially skilled at casting magic spells, decides that she wants to know this name, and so she fashions a poisonous snake which ambushes Re and bites him. Re immediately calls upon the other gods to cure him. Isis, of course, offers to cure him, but only if he answers her one request: “Tell me thy name, my divine father.”

Viewed out of context, Isis’ request, like Moses’ question, would seem absurd because Isis obviously knows this god’s name. Even though the text does not have the words “secret” or “hidden name,” the context makes it abundantly clear that this is what she wants.

Re, too, knows she wants this name, but he is not ready to give it to her. So he recites a list of his accomplishments and then ends it by saying, “I am Khepri in the morning, Re at noon, and Atum who is in the evening.” But Isis is not fooled. She already knows those names, and besides, if his secret name had been among those he had listed, he would have recovered. But Re is still sick. So Isis says to him, “Thy name is not really among these which thou has told me. If thou tellest it to me, the poison will come forth, for a person whose name is pronounced lives.” Re finally reveals his secret name (which the author himself did not know or which he withheld from his Egyptian audience so only he would know!) and is cured.

Posted in The Name of God | Leave a comment

Asking for God’s Name

In the famous story in Exodus 3, God calls to Moses out of a bush that is on fire but is not being consumed. God introduces himself as “the God of your father—the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” He then commissions Moses to return to Egypt and deliver the Israelites from their slavery. Moses feels overwhelmed and tries to get God to change his mind by asking a series of questions that are intended to show God just how inadequate Moses is to the task. One of those questions is, “Indeed, when I come to the children of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they say to me, ‘What is His name?’ what shall I say to them?” (Exod. 3:13).

God’s answer is, “I AM WHO I AM.” Then he tells Moses to say to the children of Israel that “I AM has sent me to you.” The words “I AM” in Hebrew is ‘ehyeh. The third person form of the word is yahweh, which is the name God chose for himself.

The problem with Moses’ question is that it seems to imply that Moses and the Israelites do not know God’s name. Yet Genesis makes it clear that Moses’ ancestors, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, knew that God’s name was Yahweh. Surely this name would have been passed down through the generations to Moses and the Israelites of his time. So why is Moses ask­ing for God’s name?

The answer is to be found in the Israelites’ propensity to fall into idolatry on a moment’s notice. Jacob buried the idols of his children under a tree on his way to meet God at Bethel, which shows that the Israelites practiced idolatry before they went into Egypt. The Israelites had Aaron make a golden calf which they worshiped simply because Moses had been gone for a long time, which shows that they practiced idolatry after they came out of Egypt. It is not surprising, therefore, to find they practiced idolatry while in Egypt. Near the end of his life, Joshua says to the Israel­ites, “Now therefore, fear Yahweh, serve Him in sincerity and in truth, and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the River and in Egypt. Serve Yahweh!” (Josh. 24:14). Ezekiel pictures Yahweh as commanding the Israelites who were living in Egypt before the exodus to avoid defiling themselves with the idols of Egypt, but they refused (Ezek. 20:7-8). Indeed, Ezekiel says the Israelites of his day will go into exile to break the influence that the idolatry their ancestors had learned in Egypt still had over them (Ezek. 23). Since the Israelites had lived among the Egyptians for over four hundred years, they had plenty of time to learn and adopt the Egyptian system of beliefs.

The Israelites had also spent most of those four hundred years crying out to Yahweh to free them from their slavery, and by Moses’ day they had become impa­tient with him. Asking him to deliver them was not producing the desired results, so they were looking for some way to force him to deliver them. The Egyptian belief in the secret name seemed to offer them exactly what they wanted.

Posted in The Name of God | Leave a comment

A Question of Translation

There are two verses in Exodus that seem to contradict what is said in Genesis and both of them center on the name of God. The first verse is Exod. 6:3. As it is usually translated, that verse states: “’I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as El Shaddai, but by my name Yahweh I was not known to them.’” The latter half of the verse conflicts with the book of Genesis, which clearly testifies that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob did know that God’s name was Yahweh.

The problem is the translation. The latter half of verse 3 should be translated as a rhetorical question, mak­ing the whole verse read as follows: “’I allowed myself to appear to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as El Shaddai, for did I not let myself be known to them by my name Yahweh?’” The answer, of course, is yes, he did let himself be known to them by his name Yahweh. The verse now agrees with Genesis rather than contradicting it.

An objection to this translation may be that in Hebrew a question usually begins with an interrogative pronoun or adverb (such as “who” or “where;” Hebrew does not use question marks). The latter half of verse 3 has neither, which is why most scholars fall into translating the verse in the usual manner. But in the standard textbook on Hebrew grammar, Dr. Wilhelm Gesenius, a highly respected scholar, has stated:

A question need not necessarily be introduced by a special interrogative pro­noun or adverb…. So especially, when the interrogative clause is connected with a preceding sentence by וְ [a particle which is translated as and, but, or for, depending on context]…or when (as in some of the examples just given) it is negative….

One of his examples is Jonah 4:11. This verse is connected with the preceding sentence by the particle, it is negative and it is missing an interrogative pronoun. It could be translated, “’And I should not have compassion on Nineveh, the great city,’” but this translation conflicts with the context. God was obviously explaining to Jonah why he, God, should have compassion on Nineveh. This verse, therefore, must be translated as, “And should I not have compassion on Nineveh, the great city?’” Trans­lating verse 11 as a rhetorical question and not as a negative statement makes sense because the question better fits the context.

The latter half of Exod. 6:3 is also connected with the preceding sentence by the particle, it is also negative and it is also missing an interrogative pronoun or adverb. Translating it as a rhetorical question and not as a negative statement makes sense because the question better fits the context and eliminates the contra­diction.

Translating it as a rhetorical question and not as a negative statement also shifts the meaning of the sentence from denying the knowledge of God’s name in previous generations to emphasizing the importance of this name above that of his other name, El Shaddai. This emphasis is indicated in Genesis: Yahweh is used fre­quently, El Shaddai rarely. But, given the context of verse 3, why would God want to emphasize this name above the other? To answer that, we need to turn to the other problem text.

Posted in The Name of God | Leave a comment

Exalting Me

The second trend in today’s Christian worship music that I see is the increasing emphasis on me instead of on God. The worship songs may mention the names of God and Jesus, but the focus is on me and my feelings

Worship should be about God our Father and our Lord Jesus Christ. It should be about their great love for us and what they have done for us. It should be about their faithfulness to us. Instead, today’s Christian worship music is about me and how much I love God and what I am going to do for him. It is about my faithfulness to love him and to praise him for the rest of my days. It is about me and my feelings.

For example, the song, “I Love Your Presence,” has this line in it:

I can feel you near, God.
I believe, I believe.

It implies that I believe because I can feel him near. What happens when I don’t feel him near, which is the vast majority of the time? Do I stop believing? The song implies that our belief is based on our feelings, rather than on truth.

For the truth is our feelings are not a sure foundation upon which to build our faith. Our feelings change from day to day, even from minute to minute. If we build our faith upon our feelings, then our faith wavers when the “good” feelings disappear.

The Church has always taught that our faith is based on truth. The truth is that God is always near, even when we don’t feel his presence. He always loves us, even when we feel that he does not. He is always faithful, even when we feel that he has let us down. But today’s Christian worship music assumes that our relationship with God our Father and our Lord Jesus Christ is based on our feelings rather than on truth.

The song, “You Know Me,” says “Wherever I go, you find me.” That sounds so spiritual and so Biblical because the Bible does say “I will never leave you or forsake you” (Heb. 13:5). But the line actually reverses what Jesus himself said: “If anyone serves Me, let him follow Me; and where I am, there My servant will be also” (John 12:26). God is not our servant. We should not decide where we are going next, expecting God to follow us. We are called to be the servants of Jesus Christ. He decides where he is going next, and we are expected to willingly follow him. The song ignores the truth because it is really exalting me instead of God.

But that this song exalts me should come as no surprise when you learn from where this song came. It was written in 2011 by Steffany Gretzinger and William Matthews, both of whom were worship leaders at Bill Johnson’s Bethel Church at the time. My pastor once pointed out with great insight that the Word of Faith theology is an error unto itself, but it also tends to lead people further and further away from the truth. The Word of Faith theology ends up putting us in charge. We decide if we should be wealthy and we decide if we should be made well and we end up commanding God to give those things to us. God is not in control; we are. And in fact, that is precisely what Bill Johnson teaches his congregation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB1BGhvCij4). That is why his worship leaders wrote a song that pictures God following us instead of us following God.

At the same time that today’s Christian worship music teaches us that we can control our circumstances, it also teaches us that we can’t control ourselves and even that we shouldn’t want to control ourselves. The song, “Set a Fire,” was written by Will Reagan, the same person who wrote “Break Every Chain.”  The chorus says:

So set a fire down in my soul,
That I can’t contain, that I can’t control.

But this request is contrary to what the Word teaches. The fruit of the Spirit includes self-control (Gal. 5:22-23). The Word tells us repeatedly to “be sober” (I Thess. 5:6, 8; Titus 2:2, 6; 1 Pet. 1:13, 5:8). The Word says that “the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets” (1 Cor. 14:32). The idea of losing control is a pagan idea. Satan wants us to lose control because it opens us up to demonic suggestions and can cause us to sin.

The teaching that we should lose self-control is appealing because it releases us from all responsibility for our actions. If we end up doing something wrong, well, it’s not our fault; we lost control. And yet, if we lose control and end up doing something “spiritual,” we still want the credit for it. Somehow we believe that we are better people if we love someone because we couldn’t help it, rather than choosing to love. We believe that we are more spiritual if we couldn’t help but do what is right, rather than choosing to do what is right. The Word never teaches us to lose self-control. It teaches that we are to be in full control of our faculties so that we can choose to submit them in obedience to God.

Years ago, my worship leader sang a song (I do not remember the title) in which we asked the Lord Jesus and the Holy Spirit to come fill this place and be with us. Then he prayed, “Lord Jesus, we do ask you to come fill this place.” He paused because it suddenly occurred to him what he had just requested. Then he went on: “But in fact you are already here because you said that if two or three are gathered in your name, you will be there.” This perfectly illustrates my point. So often today’s Christian worship music proclaims error because it is based on our thoughts and our feelings and our desires and, dare I say, our lusts. But the Word proclaims the truth. Our worship songs, like our teaching, should be based on the truth. Any worship song that is not is simply not worth singing.

Posted in Christian Worship | Leave a comment

“Unstoppable God” and “What a Beautiful Name”

There are two more songs that promote the Dominion/Kingdom Now theology, though not as blatantly as “Break Every Chain.” The first is “Unstoppable God.”

Heaven thundered
And the world was born
Life begins and ends
In the dust You formed
Faith commanded
And the mountains moved
Fear is losing ground
To our hope in You

Unstoppable God
Let Your glory go on and on
Impossible things
In Your name they shall be done (oh)

Freedom conquered
All our chains undone
Sin defeated
Jesus is overcome
Mercy triumphed
When the third day dawned
Darkness was denied
When the stone was gone

Nothing shall be impossible
Your kingdom reigns unstoppable
We’ll shout Your praise forevermore
Jesus our God unstoppable

The troublesome line is “Impossible things in Your name shall be done.” It says that the impossible things shall be done, not are being done, meaning that they will be done in the future. Kingdom Now theology says that this future army shall do impossible things, things that the present church has not done, things that even the apostles did not do.

The song was written by Steven Furtick, Christopher Joel Brown, and Wade Joye. These three plus Mack Brock started the worship band, Elevation Worship, in 2007. The band is the worship band for Elevation Church in Charlotte, North Carolina. Furtick is the pastor. Furtick is also a seeker friendly preacher, a Word of Faith preacher who has openly endorsed Joel Osteen, and a Dominion/Kingdom Now preacher who has spoken at least twice at an annual dominionist conference held in Ohio called Dominion Camp. It seems that if there is a Christian aberration out there, Furtick has bought into it.

The second song is “What a Beautiful Name.”

You were the Word at the beginning
One With God the Lord Most High
Your hidden glory in creation
Now revealed in You our Christ

What a beautiful Name it is
What a beautiful Name it is
The Name of Jesus Christ my King

What a beautiful Name it is
Nothing compares to this
What a beautiful Name it is
The Name of Jesus

You didn’t want heaven without us
So Jesus, You brought heaven down
My sin was great, Your love was greater
What could separate us now

What a wonderful Name it is
What a wonderful Name it is
The Name of Jesus Christ my King

What a wonderful Name it is
Nothing compares to this
What a wonderful Name it is
The Name of Jesus
What a wonderful Name it is
The Name of Jesus

How sweet is your name, Lord, how good You are
Love to sing in the name of the Lord, love to sing for you all?
Death could not hold You, the veil tore before You
You silenced the boast, of sin and grave
The heavens are roaring, the praise of Your glory
For You are raised to life again

You have no rival, You have no equal
Now and forever, Our God reigns
Yours is the Kingdom, Yours is the glory
Yours is the Name, above all names

What a powerful Name it is
What a powerful Name it is
The Name of Jesus Christ my King

What a powerful Name it is
Nothing can stand against
What a powerful Name it is
The Name of Jesus

You have no rival, You have no equal
Now and forever, Our God reigns
Yours is the Kingdom, Yours is the glory
Yours is the Name, above all names

What a powerful Name it is
What a powerful Name it is
The Name of Jesus Christ my King

What a powerful Name it is
Nothing can stand against
What a powerful Name it is
The Name of Jesus

What a powerful Name it is
The Name of Jesus
What a powerful Name it is
The Name of Jesus

The song praises the name of Jesus until it says, “You didn’t want heaven without us So Jesus, You brought heaven down.” This is Johnson’s theology. Jesus did not bring heaven down. He made it possible for us to go to heaven to be with him. Heaven will not come down until the New Jerusalem descends after there is a new heaven and a new earth.

This song was written by Brooke Ligertwood and Ben Fielding, two of the worship leaders at Hillsong Music, which is a ministry of Hillsong Church in Sydney, Australia. The pastors of Hillsong Church are Brian and Bobbie Houston. That’s right, Brian’s wife, Bobbie, is also listed as the head pastor of the church. In my research, whenever a church lets a woman be the head pastor, even if she is married to the head pastor, deception always follows. For example, Bill Johnson and his wife, Beni, are listed as the Senior Leaders of Bethel Church.

Hillsong has been criticized for not taking a clear stand on homosexuality. The Houstons’ son, Joel, is a worship leader. In a recent worship song which he wrote, he uses a swear word (“Even when it hurts like h—“, https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/hillsongunited/evenwhenithurtspraisesong.html ), which shows that the quality of the worship songs coming out of Hillsong is declining.

So how did Johnson’s theology get into one of their songs? Every year Hillsong Church hosts a conference which is held in Australia, then again in other parts of the world. Brian Johnson, Bill Johnson’s son and a worship leader at Bethel Church, was a speaker at the 2016 conference. Other Word of Faith preachers, such as Joseph Prince from Singapore, have spoken at past conferences. Rick Warren and his followers have also been speakers at it. Furtick is a speaker at this year’s conference. So, like Furtick, Houston seems to have bought into whatever Christian aberration is out there. Many of our worship songs come out of Hillsong Music. I worry about the kinds of songs we will be seeing from there in the near future.

Posted in Christian Worship | Leave a comment

“Break Every Chain”

Another popular worship song, one that blatantly preaches the Dominion/Kingdom Now theology, is “Break Every Chain.” Here are the lyrics:

There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus

To break every chain
To break every chain
To break every chain

To break every chain
To break every chain
Break every chain

All sufficient sacrifice
So freely given
Such a price
Bought our redemption
Heaven’s gates swing wide

There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

There’s an army rising up
There’s an army rising up
There’s an army rising up

To break every chain
To break every chain
To break every chain

There’s an army rising up
There’s an army rising up
There’s an army rising up

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

To break every chain
Break every chain
Break every chain

There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus
There is power in the name of Jesus

To break every chain
To break every chain
To break every chain

Break every chain!

Kingdom Now theology says that in the latter days, there will be a latter rain outpouring of the Holy Spirit who will anoint an army that will rise up and break the chains that currently bind the seven “mountains” or spheres of influence: family, education, government, economy, arts, media, and religion. Once this army succeeds in breaking these chains, the Church will dominate the world and then Christ will return.

The song was written by Will Reagan and was recorded by him and his band, United Pursuit, in 2009. I have not been able to find out what Reagan or the band specifically believe, but they do seem to have been influenced by the Dominion/Kingdom Now theology. Here are the lyrics to another song written by Reagan:

With the wind
At our backs
And in the strength
Of the Lord
We will rise
On the wings
Of the dawn

We’re gonna take back
All the enemy has stolen

It’s in the blood
Of the One who’s worthy
I know God has not forgotten
All that’s lost and broken
So, come and see the turning of the times

Come and see His sons and daughters rise
For how could He who did not spare His own son
Not freely give us victory
Against the darkest of nights

We’re gonna take back
All the enemy has stolen

We’re gonna plunder the pits of hell
We’re gonna plunder the pits of hell
We’re gonna plunder the pits of hell
We’re gonna plunder the pits of hell
We’re gonna plunder the pits of hell
We’re gonna plunder the pits of hell
We’re gonna plunder the pits of hell
We’re gonna plunder the pits of hell

Dominion theology teaches that the Church must take back what it has lost to Satan, including the dominion over the whole earth.

“Break Every Chain” was then recorded in 2011 by Jesus Culture, which is Bethel Church’s youth worship band. This is not surprising because Johnson also teaches Kingdom Now theology.

The song was then popularized by Tasha Cobbs, who recorded it in 2012. The song went straight to number one on the Billboard charts for gospel music. Cobbs is one of the pastors at dReam Center Church (yes, that is how they spell it) in Atlanta, GA. The church’s website does not have a statement of faith and I cannot find anywhere what they specifically teach. However, this is what they say about themselves on their website (as of 2016; they are revising their website as of today):

About Us

The dReam Center Church of Atlanta is called to change the world’s expectation of the church, by emerging as a generation of honor and influence. We embrace the foundational truths recorded in scripture and yet we remain relevant and necessary for mankind’s evolution and growth. We are to encourage, teach and train men to discover and execute their God-given assignment to subdue and dominate the earth. Our expression of worship is aligned with the times, but founded and rooted in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We are not a black church, but a Kingdom Church, that does not identify solely with any certain ethnic grouping. We are, in truth, a multi-cultural ministry, and a House of Prayer for all nations…

So Cobbs recorded the song because it fits so well with her church’s vision of itself as a Kingdom Church and its emphasis on teaching men to “subdue and dominate the earth.”

Like Johnson, many of the Kingdom Now preachers are also health/wealth preachers. That makes sense because if the Kingdom is here on the earth right now, then we should be able to enjoy its benefits right now and its benefits include health and wealth. The army is to rise up and break every chain, including the chains of poverty and sickness. Thus, on the website of the dReam Center Church, there was a picture of the stage with a backdrop that says, “do it BIG.” Underneath are the areas of life which the church emphasizes: prayer, worship, family, evangelism, education, wealth development, social action. Note the last two.

The head pastor of the dReam Center is William Murphy III.  In a YouTube video in which he was interviewed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajpZUgfLY38), he says that his mentor and overseer was Eddie Long. Long is a WOF (Word of Faith) preacher. Murphy also says that Long’s overseer was T.D. Jakes, who also preaches the health/wealth gospel. He also says that Paul S. Morton is his pastor. Morton preaches the same thing that Johnson does (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUy69v6-nOc; near the end of this video, the choir sings “Break Every Chain” during the altar call).

So the song “Break Every Chain” keeps showing up in Kingdom Now and Word of Faith circles because those preachers interpret the song as promoting their theology.

To be continued…

Posted in Christian Worship | Leave a comment

The Song “Our Father”

Some of the songs that promote the Dominion/Kingdom Now theology (as well as the Word of Faith theology) have come from or through IHOP and Bethel Church. The song, “Our Father,” was written in 2009 by Marcus Meier, a worship leader at IHOP. Here are the lyrics:

Our Father in Heaven
Hallowed be Your name
Your Kingdom come quickly
Your will be done the same

On Earth as it is in Heaven
Let Heaven come to
Earth as it is in Heaven
Let Heaven come

Let Heaven come, let Heaven come

Yours is the Kingdom, Yours is the power
Yours is the glory forever, amen
Yours is the Kingdom, Yours is the power
Yours is the glory forever amen

This song promotes Johnson’s teaching. The chorus splits off Johnson’s favorite slogan, “On earth as it is in heaven,” from the rest of the sentence, “Your will be done,” just as Johnson does in his teachings. The chorus also adds and repeats the request, “Let heaven come,” meaning let heaven come down to earth, which is what Johnson teaches.

Johnson’s teaching got into the song because his teaching has obviously infiltrated IHOP because Bickle has endorsed Johnson. It comes as no surprise, therefore, that the song became a part of Bethel Church’s worship and appeared on one of their albums.

To be continued…

Posted in Christian Worship | Leave a comment

International House of Prayer

Johnson is also closely tied to an organization called the International House of Prayer in Kansas City, Missouri (IHOP for short, also known as IHOPKC, since they have also opened houses of prayer in other cities around the world). IHOP was founded and is led by Mike Bickle. Bickle started Kansas City Fellowship in the 80s. Several so-called prophets became associated with that fellowship and became known as the Kansas City Prophets. These prophets have been shown to be false prophets and have even been involved in sexual sins and homosexuality, which is why Bickle has distanced himself from them. Even so, their influence and their Kingdom Now teachings have spread. Bickle himself is a Kingdom Now preacher, though a subtle one. He claims that he is not one on the IHOP website, but his teachings show that he is one. He did a teaching at the Toronto church in May 2010 which shows that he is a Kingdom Now believer (https://mikebickle.org/resources/resource/2930?return_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmikebickle.org%2Fresources%2Fcategory%2Fministry-outreach%2Fevangelism%2F). I have downloaded the study notes and highlighted in red the points that show he teaches the Kingdom Now and Word of Faith doctrines. It is available at www.claytonhowardford.com/MikeBickle.doc.

In the late 80s Wimber, the leader of the Vineyard Fellowship, became enamored with Bickle and these prophets, but when the sins of these prophets became public, Bickle placed himself under Wimber’s leadership and Kansas City Fellowship became Metro Vineyard Fellowship. However, when the Toronto revival began, Bickle endorsed it. When the Toronto church left the Vineyard Fellowship, Bickle’s church did, too, and became Metro Christian Fellowship.

Bickle resigned as pastor of the church in 2000 to lead IHOP. IHOP has had worship and prayer going 24/7 365 days a year since September 1999. Bickle also founded a school of ministry called IHOP University. In November, 2009, a “revival” started at the university among the students. The same manifestations that occurred in Toronto occurred here. The leaders of the school taught that it was God’s will to heal everyone. Mike Bickle and Lou Engle, who at that time was the leader of a ministry named The Call, wrote a letter about that revival. You can find it here: https://www.xpmedia.com/article/95/a-letter-from-mike-bickle-and-lou-engle. At the bottom of the letter (under “About the Author”), it says that IHOP is committed to “impact the seven spheres of society.” That is dominion theology.

After a few weeks of this, the leaders of the school became concerned that the “revival” might be fizzling out, so they invited two pastors to join them for a week of meetings to teach them how to keep the “revival” going. One of those pastors was John Arnott from Toronto. The other was Johnson.

Johnson has kept in touch with IHOP. Every year IHOP hosts a youth conference called OneThing. Over 20,000 youth from across the nation attend this annually. Johnson was a speaker at the 2016 conference.

Lou Engle has also been a speaker at these One Thing conferences. The Call was a ministry that called the youth of America to fasting and prayer, which sounds like a legitimate ministry. But Engle promotes ecumenism. He organized a rally that was held in Los Angeles in April 2016 called Azusa Now. Ostensibly, the purpose of the rally was to celebrate the 110th anniversary of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on Azusa Street in 1906, which was the beginning of the Pentecostal movement. In reality, the purpose of the rally was to gather people of all denominations, including the Roman Catholic denomination, and preach that we should forget doctrinal purity and just be united. This is what happened at that rally: https://christiannews.net/2016/04/10/lou-engle-of-the-call-prostrates-himself-kisses-foot-of-catholic-leader-as-act-of-reconciliation/

Bickle also promotes ecumenism through the One Thing conferences as this video shows:

To be continued…

Posted in Christian Worship | Leave a comment

The History Behind Some Recent Worship Songs

Some popular worship songs, written over the last few years, teach Dominion/Kingdom Now theology.

Let me give some history behind these songs. In the late 70s, a group of people within Calvary Chapel, led by John Wimber, the pastor of the Calvary Chapel in Yorba Linda, California, wanted the worship to be more emotionally expressive and open to the Holy Spirit. Chuck Smith, the leader of Calvary Chapel, disagreed. So these people left Calvary and joined a small but growing group of churches known as Vineyard Fellowship. Wimber became the leader of this group.

In the 80s a Vineyard church was started in Toronto, called the Toronto Airport Vineyard Christian Fellowship, pastored by John Arnott. He is still the pastor of that church. A “revival” broke out in that church in January 1994, in which the people began to laugh uncontrollably, rolling in the aisles, and even making animal noises. This “revival” attracted international attention and became known as “The Toronto Blessing.” Arnott prefers to call it “The Father’s Blessing.” It has since spread to many churches around the world. These manifestations are still going on in this church even today.

Apparently, these manifestations proved to be too emotional even for Vineyard Fellowship because this church was eventually excommunicated from the Fellowship. It was renamed Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship. Now they call themselves Catch the Fire Fellowship.

In February 1995, Bill Johnson, the pastor of what was then Bethel Assembly of God Church in Redding, California, visited the revival in Toronto. He claims that he never was touched by the Spirit like the others were and so never had any of the manifestations, but still believed it was a move of God nonetheless and brought it back to his church. There have been reports of these manifestations occurring in his church ever since. Bill Johnson has kept in touch with the Toronto church. In January 2014, the Toronto church celebrated the 20th anniversary of the revival and Johnson was the keynote speaker. There is a video on YouTube of his sermon. In that sermon, he states that he sees the Toronto church as the “Mother Ship” and his church as just one of the “satellite ships” of the Toronto church (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0mPt2twjlE).

Besides promoting the Toronto revival in his church, Johnson is also a health/wealth preacher and a Kingdom Now preacher. Johnson’s favorite slogan is “On earth as it is in heaven.” He teaches that if one truly has faith, then it will be here on earth as it is in heaven for that believer. Since there is no poverty or sickness in heaven, there should be no poverty or sickness for the believer here on earth. In short, by faith, we can bring heaven down here to earth. Bethel Church is no longer an Assembly of God church. Neither Bill Johnson nor the Assemblies of God will publicly say why Bethel Church left the Assemblies of God denomination, but one can surmise that the Assemblies of God did not agree with Johnson’s teachings. Twice in the last 60 years the Assemblies of God have publicly denounced the Latter Rain movement (another name for Kingdom Now Theology) as a heresy.

To be continued…

Posted in Christian Worship | 2 Comments

Kingdom Now Theology

Kingdom Now Theology is a version of Dominion Theology that is more popular in Pentecostal and Charismatic churches. It teaches that the Kingdom exists on the earth even now, but that the Church must still spread it over the whole earth. The Church will be able to do this when God raises up an elite group of believers known as “Joel’s Army.” This army is also known as “The New Breed,” “The Elijah Company,” “The Bride,” “The Manifested Sons of God,” or “The Latter Rain.”

This teaching is derived from the teaching of the Latter Rain Movement which first arose in the 1940s among members of the Assemblies of God church. The Assemblies of God leadership saw the danger in this teaching and condemned it as a heresy in 1949 and again in 2001.

The Latter Rain Movement is based on Joel 2:23-24. It says that the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost was the early rain. The latter rain will occur when God again pours out the Holy Spirit upon the Church just before Christ returns, but this outpouring will be greater than the first. Those who receive this latter rain outpouring will again move in the power and the gifts of the Spirit, but they will be able to perform more and greater miracles and signs than anyone in the early Church ever did. Because of this, the Church will also see the greatest harvest of souls it has ever seen.

Of course, this is not what the Bible teaches. 2 Thess. 2:3 says that there will not be a great harvest just before Christ returns but a great falling away. And the power and the gifts of the Spirit have never been taken from the Church, so why would there be a second outpouring?

The Kingdom Now Theology takes the Latter Rain teaching one step further. It says that those who receive the latter rain outpouring will become the army prophesied in Joel 2:1-11. This army will rise up and take dominion over the whole earth. They will take over all of the governments, all of the schools, all of the economies, and all of the social institutions, thereby breaking the chains of these institutions. They will do so through warfare, spiritual or (according to some) otherwise. Some even teach that the army’s first task will be to eliminate anyone who resists this teaching and therefore stands in the way of this army.

This, of course, is a misinterpretation of Joel. The prophecy in Joel 2 is not about the army of God spreading the Kingdom through an unrighteous world but about God’s coming judgment upon his own people, Israel, for their continued disobedience. Furthermore, the Church has already been appointed to be an army and as soldiers in this army, each of us is commanded to put on the whole armor of God (Eph. 6:10-17). But our warfare is not “against flesh and blood” but against “spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places” (Eph. 6:12). In resisting these false teachings, we must remember that we are not fighting against the people who teach these things but against the spiritual hosts who have deceived them.

To be continued…

Posted in Christian Worship | Leave a comment