Clayton Howard Ford

Lesson 7

Some objections to the Deity of Christ

John 10:30-39 – Jesus referred to other people as “gods” (v. 34). So Jesus is also a “god” in the same sense.

Jesus is quoting Ps. 82:6. The Hebrew word for “gods” is elohim, which is most often translated as God or gods, but it literally means “mighty ones.” One can be mighty because he is a “god,” or because he is physically strong, or because he holds a position of authority. Therefore, what this word means depends on context. In Ps. 82, the “gods” are in fact the judges of Israel, who are expected to judge righteously, like God does. Elohim is also translated as judges in Exod. 21:5-6 and 22:7-9.

So Jesus is saying that if the judges, who are mere men, can be called “gods” because they hold positions of authority, why do you object when I, who has been set apart and sent here by the Father himself and is therefore of greater authority than the judges, say that I am the Son of God? Jesus is not saying that he is a “god,” but is above these so-called “gods” because he is the Son of God and therefore has the same divine nature as God the Father. The Jews understood this immediately, for they tried to stone him for blasphemy.

John 1:1 – In the Greek, the definite article (“the”) appears before the first use of “God” but not before the second use. This implies that there is a distinction between the first God (“the God,” meaning the Father) and the second god (“a god,” meaning the Son).

Actually, Greek is very careless with the definite article. Sometimes it uses it, sometimes it does not. For example, Greek often uses the definite article before proper names, but not always. In John 1:47, the article appears before the name Jesus but in John 1:50, it does not. Does this imply that there are two Jesuses? Of course not.

The definite article does not always appear before God even though the Father is clearly meant. For example, in John 1:18, “God” clearly refers to the Father, but the definite article is not used. The objection, therefore, is definitely pointless.

John 1:18 – Jesus is called “the only begotten,” meaning that he had a beginning. Therefore, he can be a “god,” but not God.

The Greek word for “only begotten,” monogenēs, can also mean “unique.” It is used in Heb. 11:17 of Isaac, who is obviously not Abraham’s only begotten son but is his unique son. Therefore, when monogenēs is used of Jesus, it refers to his unique status as the only Son of God.

The Nicene Creed affirms that Jesus was “begotten, not made,” and the Creed of Chalcedon explicitly says that Jesus was “begotten of his Father before the worlds according to his Godhead.” What these Creeds are trying to say is that the word “begotten” actually confirms the divine nature of Jesus Christ. Just as humans beget humans, so, too, God begets God. This is not to imply that Jesus had a beginning. It means that his Sonship differs from everyone else. Believers are the sons of God (John 1:12) by adoption but Jesus is the only Son of God by nature. When monogenēs is used of Jesus, therefore, it refers to his unique status as the only Son who has the same nature as the Father.

John 14:28 – Jesus said that his Father is greater than he is, so Jesus cannot be equal in nature to God.

This objection does not take into account the difference between nature and authority. If my son and I were working at the same corporation and he were the janitor and I were the CEO, I would have more authority than he would (thus, I would be greater than him), but we would still have the same nature. The Father has more authority than the Son, which makes him greater than Jesus, but they still have the same divine nature.

1 Cor. 8:5-6 – Paul says that there is only one God and that God is the Father. Therefore, Jesus cannot be God.

Paul also says that there is only one Lord and that Lord is Jesus Christ. So, if the objection were legitimate, that would mean that the Father and the Holy Spirit cannot also be Lord. Yet, Paul calls the Father Lord in 2 Cor. 6:17-18 and he calls the Holy Spirit Lord in 2 Cor. 3:17.

Paul is drawing a contrast between the world and us. In the world, there are many so-called gods and lords, but for us there is only one God and one Lord.

Lesson 6

After the Council of Constantinople affirmed that Jesus is in fact both God and man, the problem became, “How can Jesus be both at the same time? How do the two natures interact with each other?”

To most people, the divine nature and the human nature cannot be reconciled because in many ways they are opposite of each other. According to the Scriptures themselves:

God                                                                            Jesus

Does not sleep – Ps. 121:3-4                                 Slept – Matt. 8:24
Is invisible – 1 Tim. 1:17                                        Was seen – 1 John 1:1-3
Is immortal – 1 Tim. 1:17                                      Died – John 19:33
Is infinite – Jer. 23:24, Ps. 139                           Is finite

How, then, do we reconcile these two natures?

Apollinaris was the bishop of Laodicea in Syria. He died in 390 AD. He said that Jesus was a man except that he did not have a human soul or spirit. God the Son was his spirit. So Jesus was fully God but not fully human. He believed that Jesus had 1 body and was 1 person who had 2 natures, but one of those natures was not complete. This teaching was condemned by the Council of Constantinople in 381 AD.

Nestorius was the archbishop of Constantinople from 428 AD to 431 AD, when he was exiled for his teaching. He acknowledged the complete manhood of Jesus but said that his human nature was separate from his divine nature so that Jesus had 1 body but was 2 persons, one that was human and one that was divine. This teaching was condemned at the Council of Ephesus in 431 AD.

In reaction to Nestorius, Eutyches, who was an elder in Constantinople, went to the other extreme. He taught that the human nature of Jesus was so united to the divine nature that it was absorbed by the divine nature, so that even though Jesus had the same substance as the Father, he did not have the same substance as the rest of humanity. He believed that Jesus had 1 body and was 1 person who had only 1 nature. This teaching was condemned by the Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD.

The Council of Chalcedon issued this Creed:

Following the holy Fathers we teach with one voice that the Son [of God] and our Lord Jesus Christ is to be confessed as one and the same [Person], that he is perfect in Godhead and perfect in manhood, very God and very man, of a reasonable soul and [human] body consisting, consubstantial with the Father as touching his Godhead, and consubstantial with us as touching his manhood; made in all things like unto us, sin only excepted; begotten of his Father before the worlds according to his Godhead; but in these last days for us men and for our salvation born [into the world] of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God according to his manhood.  This one and the same Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son [of God] must be confessed to be in two natures, unconfusedly, immutably, indivisibly, inseparably [united], and that without the distinction of natures being taken away by such union, but rather the peculiar property of each nature being preserved and being united in one Person and subsistence, not separated or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son and only-begotten, God the Word, our Lord Jesus Christ, as the Prophets of old time have spoken concerning him, and as the Lord Jesus Christ hath taught us, and as the Creed of the Fathers hath delivered to us.

The Creed affirms that Jesus has 1 body and is 1 person who has 2 natures. It does not explain how the two natures work together because in actuality we do not know how they work. That is one of the mysteries of God that we do not understand, so the Church leaders who wrote this Creed were wise to not even attempt to explain how they work together. They simply did what the Scriptures do: they affirm that Jesus is both God and man but never try to explain how he could be both at the same time.

Other Scriptures that show the Deity of Jesus Christ:

Matt. 1:23
Matt. 28:17
John 5:17-18
John 10:30-33
John 20:28
Acts 20:28
Phil. 2:6
1 Tim. 3:16
Tit. 2:13
Heb. 1:1-3
Heb. 1:8
1 John 5:20
Is. 44:6 with Rev. 22:13
Is. 45:22-23 with Phil. 2:10

Lesson 5

4. God the Son

Jesus Christ is, of course, the central figure of Christianity. He is why Christianity is called Christianity. The Scriptures clearly teach that Jesus was more than a man: he was and is also God in the flesh. The Scriptures also tell us why it is necessary to believe that he is both God and man:

And this is His commandment: that we should believe on the name (that is, who he really is) of His Son Jesus Christ and love one another, as He gave us commandment (1 John 3:23).

He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life (1 John 5:12).

“Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that I AM, you will die in your sins” (John 8:24).

If we do not believe in Jesus, the REAL Jesus, the one who is both God and man, we will die in our sins.

Before we can begin to understand how Jesus could be both man and God, we need to understand the difference between nature and person.

Nature means kind or sort. For example, God created all of the animals, each “according to its kind” (Gen. 1:25). Specifically, nature means “the particular combination of qualities belonging to a person, animal, thing, or class by birth, origin, or constitution; native or inherent character.” For example, human nature is the set of characteristics that are common to humans. Human nature is what makes us human. Horse nature is what makes horses, horses. Dog nature is what makes dogs, dogs. The divine nature is what makes God, God.

Person refers to the individual who is distinct from everyone else. All of us have the human nature in common, but each of us is a distinctive person.

Jesus is one person, that is, he is an individual distinct from everyone else, including the Father and the Holy Spirit, and he has two natures, one human and one divine. All of the heresies fail to understand this in one way or another: they either deny that Christ was one person or they deny that he had two natures, one human and one divine.

I will show you what the major heresies taught (because some of them are still around) so you can understand where they went wrong. We will also see what the Scriptures say so we can see what is the correct way of understanding who Jesus is.

Dynamic Monarchianism, also known as Adoptionism, says that Jesus, who was a mere man, was adopted as the Son of God at his baptism or at his resurrection. They see Jesus as one person with only one nature, the human nature.

John 1:1,14 says that Jesus has always been God and so was never adopted.

Ebionites say that Jesus was a mere man and that Christ descended on him at baptism. Another version says that Christ descended on him after the temptation. They see Jesus as two persons in one body. Jesus is a man who has the human nature and Christ is the Son of God who has the divine nature.

Luke 2:11 says that Jesus was declared to be the Christ at his birth.

Modalistic Monarchianism (Sabellianism) says that Jesus is merely one mode in which God may appear. The Father and the Holy Spirit are the other modes. In other words, God is only one person who sometimes appears as the Father, sometimes as the Son and sometimes as the Holy Spirit. They see Jesus as one person with only one nature, the divine nature.

In John 14:16-17, Jesus speaks of the Father and the Holy Spirit as persons distinct from him and from each other. In other words, he speaks of them as three distinct persons.

Gnosticism says that Christ is a being who is almost like God. Christ did not actually take on a body of flesh and blood but only appeared to have taken on a human body. They see Christ as one person with only one nature, a semi-divine nature. Christian Science is a form of Gnosticism.

1 John 4:2-3 condemns Gnosticism.

Arianism says that Christ is the first created being and is like God. He has a similar substance (nature) as the Father, but not the same substance (nature) as the Father. He did take on flesh and become a man. They see Jesus as one person with two natures, but not with the divine nature. This is the position taken by the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

John 1:3 says that the Word, Jesus, created all things, so Jesus is not a created being.

Of these heresies, Arianism proved to be the most influential. Many believers and Church leaders in the late third century and early fourth century became followers of this heresy and it almost split the Church. Constantine called for a council of bishops to convene in the city of Niceae in 325 AD to decide if Arianism was in fact a heresy. This council produced the first version of the Nicene Creed, which affirmed that Christ was both man and God and had the same substance (nature) as the Father. The Arian heresy, however, persisted, forcing the Council of Constantinople to issue a revision of the Nicene Creed in 381 AD. This is the final version of the Nicene Creed. The word “catholic” here means “universal”; it does not refer to the Roman Catholic Church.

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father; by whom all things were made; who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary, and was made man; he was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered, and was buried, and the third day he rose again, according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right hand of the Father; from thence he shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end.
And in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of life, who proceeds from the Father, who with the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets. In one holy catholic and apostolic Church; we acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; we look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

This creed is the only one accepted by all of the Christian denominations.

Lesson 4

3. God the Holy Spirit

The Holy Spirit is probably the most misunderstood person of the Trinity. What must we believe about the Holy Spirit according to the Scriptures?

First, we must believe that the Holy Spirit is a person. Some people think of the Holy Spirit as a thing. They say that, just as we have a spirit, so, too, God has a Spirit. Others, like the Jehovah’s Witnesses, say that the Holy Spirit is merely a force, the power of God.

But the Scriptures teach that the Holy Spirit is a person. The best evidence is that Christ refers to the Holy Spirit using the pronouns “He” and “Him,” not “it” (John 14-16).

Jesus also referred to the Holy Spirit as “another Helper” (John 14:16-17). Greek has two words that can be translated as “another.” The first, eteros, means “another of a similar or different kind”: “You sampled that apple. Now try another kind of fruit, this time an orange.”

The second, allos, means “another of the same kind”: “You sampled that apple. Now try another apple.” Both words are used in Gal. 1:6-7: “I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different (eteros) gospel, which is not another (allos); but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ.”

Jesus used the latter word. The Holy Spirit is the same kind of Helper that Jesus is. He is and does what Jesus is and does.

The Scriptures also tell us that the Holy Spirit has the attributes of a person and does what only a person can do. He:

has a will (1 Cor. 12:11, Heb. 2:4)
makes decisions (Acts 15:28)
helps (John 14:16)
dwells (John 14:17)
teaches (John 14:26; Luke 12:12; 1 Cor. 2:13)
testifies (John 15:26)
is a witness (Acts 5:32)
convicts (John 16:8)
guides (John 16:13)
speaks (John16:13; Acts 28:25; Heb. 3:7)
inspired the prophets (2 Pet. 1:21)
forbids (Acts 16:6)
prays for us (Rom. 8:26)
can be grieved (Is. 63:10; Eph. 4:30)

Second, we must believe that the Holy Spirit is God.

Peter said that lying to the Holy Spirit is the same as lying to God (Acts 5:3-4).

And Paul says, “Now the Lord is the Spirit” (2 Cor. 3:17).

The Holy Spirit also has the attributes of God. He is omnipresent (Ps. 139:7), omniscient (1 Cor. 2:10-11), and eternal (Heb. 9:14).

Lesson 3

2. God the Father

The Bible has a lot to say about God the Father, and we could not possibly cover it all in one night. Besides, we are studying the essential doctrines about Christianity, the doctrines that make Christianity, Christianity. So what does a person need to believe about God in order to be a Christian?

There is one verse in the Bible that tells us what we must believe about God in order to be a Christian: “But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him” (Heb. 11:6).

The Bible says that those who do not believe these things are fools (Ps. 14:1-3).

First of all, Heb. 11:6 says that we must believe that He is, that is, that He exists.

Atheists argue that philosophy (logic) and science always lead us to the truth. They also argue that God’s existence cannot be proven philosophically (logically) or scientifically. That is why they do not believe that he exists.

However, if philosophy always leads us to the truth, why are there so many philosophies? There is Platonism, Aristotelianism, hedonism, stoicism, utilitarianism, existentialism, nihilism, and many, many others, none of which completely agrees with any of the others.

Science is limited to dealing only with that part of the physical realm that is observable. By “observable,” scientists mean “measureable.” How do you measure a spiritual being who is bigger than the universe?

Besides, science changes its mind every 50 years.

Not once do the writers of the Bible attempt a philosophical or scientific proof of God’s existence. They do not try to prove his existence any more than they try to prove the existence of Abraham or Moses or Paul.

The Bible presents only two proofs of God’s existence. The first is in Rom. 1:18-20:

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse.

God uses nature to show that he exists.

The phrase “things that are made” in v. 20 is only one word in the Greek. That word is poiema, which originally meant “anything made by hand,” but by New Testament times came to mean “a work of art.” We get our word poem from this Greek word.

So God’s existence and his character are revealed by nature, which is his poem.

This Greek word is used in only one other place in the entire New Testament: “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them” (Eph. 2:10). Here the Greek word is translated as “workmanship.”

According to this verse, we are God’s poem. Our job is the same as nature’s: God wants to use us to show the world, by how we live, who he really is and that he exists. In short, God’s existence is proven by the testimony of nature and by our testimony.

Second of all, Heb. 11:6 tells us that we must believe that He is, that is, that this God exists.

Atheism was not a problem when Hebrews was written. Almost everybody believed in some sort of god. The writer of Hebrews is saying that it is not enough to believe in a god; we must believe in this God, the God who was proclaimed by Jesus Christ.

Jesus came to show us who God really is: “I have manifested Your name to the men whom You have given Me out of the world” (John 17:6). He came to manifest God’s name, that is, to show us God’s character. The best summary of God’s character is found in Exod. 33:18-19 and 34:6-7. Moses asked to see God’s glory and God said he would show Moses his goodness. In other words, God’s glory is his goodness. Some people in the world believe that God exists, but that he is a mean or vengeful or judgmental God. We must show the world that God is good.

Third of all, Heb. 11:6 says that we must believe that he is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him.

This also implies that he is a rewarder (or, rather, punisher) of those who do not seek him. It is not enough to simply believe in God’s existence. He wants us to enter into a relationship with him. He wants us to search for him and find him.

He constantly urged Israel to seek him: Is. 55:6-7, Jer. 29:13, Amos 5:4.

If we diligently seek him, he will reward us. What is his reward? First it is Himself. Second it is life, for he is life (Deut. 30:19-20).

So why is it necessary to believe in God and have a relationship with him?

Because that is the only way to obtain eternal life: “And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom You have sent” (John 17:3).

There is one more thing that we must believe about God in order to be Christians: we must believe that this God exists because he is in fact the only God who exists.

The Scriptures tell us over and over again that the Christian God is the only God and that all of the other so-called gods do not exist.

“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one!” (Deut. 6:4; quoted by Jesus in Mark 12:29).

“that all the peoples of the earth may know that the Lord is God; there is no other” (1 Kings 8:60).

Therefore concerning the eating of things offered to idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is no other God but one. For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as there are many gods and many lords), yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live (1 Cor. 8:4-6).

For there is on God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus (1 Tim. 2:5).

In Isaiah’s time, Israel was heavily involved in idolatry, so God used Isaiah to emphasize the truth that the God of Israel is the only true God.

Is. 43:10-12
Is. 44:6
Is. 44:8
Is. 44:24
Is. 45:5-6
Is. 45:14
Is. 45:18
Is. 45:21-22
Is. 46:9

Since the other so-called gods do not really exist (or are demons), they cannot save us. We must believe in the Christian God because he is the only one who can save us (Is. 45:22) and the only one who can give us eternal life (John 17:3).

Lesson 2

A third objection is, “The Bible as we now have it is not what was originally written.” This objection can take two forms. One is that changes were accidentally made to the Bible so that we can no longer trust that we have what the authors originally wrote. The other form is that changes were made deliberately by the religious leaders to foist their beliefs upon their unsuspecting followers.

The original books of the New Testament were written on papyrus or parchment. Tertullian, who wrote in 200 AD, said that the original books could still be seen in the Churches in his day.

However, these books eventually decayed, so copies had to be made by hand. When those copies decayed, they were copied by hand. Over the years, scribes made copies of copies of copies of copies. Some of those copies have survived, but the original books have not. Of course, in the process of making these copies, mistakes were made, which is why some people say that we cannot trust that what we have is what the authors originally wrote.

Every ancient book has undergone this process of being copied by hand, including Homer’s Iliad and Caesar’s Gallic Wars. In each case, scholars wish to know what the author had originally written. To find out, they use a process called textual criticism.

Textual critics look for two important factors when studying the hand-written copies of any book. The first is age. The older a copy is, the closer it was to the original, and therefore less likely to have mistakes. The second factor is the number of copies. If we have eight copies and four of them say one thing and four say another, it is difficult to know which ones are correct. But if we have 5000 copies and 100 say one thing and the other 4900 say another thing, we have a better idea of which ones are correct. Look at these famous ancient works and notice how few copies we have:

                                        Time of             Oldest         Gap             Number of
Author                         Writing             Copy           (Years)       Copies

Aristotle (Poetics)         343 BC                1100 AD       1400              5

Plato (Tetralogies)       427-347 BC        900 AD        1250              7

Herodotus (History)    480-425 BC       900 AD        1350              8

Thucydides                     460-400 BC      900 AD        1300              8

Caesar (Gallic Wars)   100-44 BC          900 AD        950               10

Homer (Iliad)               800 BC                400 BC        400               643

Compare those numbers with those of the New Testament. The last book of the New Testament was written around 80-90 AD. The oldest copy of the almost complete New Testament was written around 325-350 AD, a gap of only 270 years.

The oldest copy of a portion of the New Testament contains John 18:31-33 and 37, and it was written around 130 AD, only 50 years later.

We currently have over 5000 copies of the New Testament or portions of it in the Greek and almost 20,000 more copies in other languages.

The small gap between the original writings and the oldest copies as well as the sheer number of copies makes the New Testament the easiest text to reconstruct and assures us that the copies which we read in our homes are in fact reliable copies of the original text. Some textual critics have even said that the New Testament copies are more reliable than any ten ancient literary works combined.

The story with the Old Testament is different. We do not have a large number of copies and the copies we do have are relatively young. The oldest complete Hebrew manuscript we have was written around 1000 AD, more than 1400 years after Malachi was written. However, we know that the Jews were very meticulous when making copies of the text, and burned the ones that contained mistakes, which is why we have so few copies. The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, which were written around 300 BC to 100 AD, only confirmed that the copy which we have is very reliable, for the Scrolls agree quite well with it.

We must understand that the doctrine of the inspiration of the Bible only applies to the original writings and not to the copies. The copies do contain mistakes, but not as many as some would claim.

What we call mistakes, scholars call variants. The vast majority of these variants are trivial, such as the difference in the spelling of a word. If 20,000 copies have one spelling and 4,000 have another spelling, scholars count that as 4,000 variants. The verses in the New Testament that have variants are only 12.5% of all of the verses. Some variants do change the meaning of the text. Those verses come to only 1.66% of the entire New Testament. In other words, the copies have preserved 98.33% of the original writings. Compare that to Homer’s Iliad, which is only 95% preserved. And none of those verses affect the doctrines historically taught by the Christian Church.

The objection that the early Church leaders changed the Bible to make it say what they wanted it to say is absurd. The leaders would have had to gather the thousands of copies that were scattered all over the Roman Empire, destroy them, and then issue new copies, all without the rest of the Church being in the least bit suspicious. Impossible.

The objection that the Bible contains so many mistakes that it is not what the authors originally wrote is also absurd. God has seen to it that the copies have remarkably preserved 98.33% of the original writings and the differences are trivial.

So why did God not preserve 100% of the original? Probably because of our propensity for idolatry. As it is, some people have a relationship with their Bible but not with the author of the Bible. We must remember that the purpose of the Bible is to help us develop a close relationship with God, not replace him.

The blogs in this category are the notes I used when teaching this series.

The Basic Doctrines of the Christian Faith

Lesson 1

In this series, we will learn about the doctrines that make Christianity, Christianity. If a person does not believe that any of these doctrines is true, that person is not a Christian.

We will learn what these doctrines are and how they are supported by the Bible. We Christians do not accept a doctrine as true unless it can be supported by the Bible, so the first doctrine we will discuss is what we believe about the Bible.

1. The Bible

We believe the Bible is the inspired and inerrant Word of God.

a. We believe that the Bible is the inspired Word of God.

All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness (2 Tim. 3:16-17).

“Is given by inspiration of God” is one Greek word, theopneustos, which literally means God-breathed.

It is true that men wrote the books of the Bible, but God inspired them, that is, he made sure they wrote what he wanted written.

We believe in the verbal plenary inspiration of the Bible, that is, we believe that every word of the Bible is inspired. If only part of the Bible is the inspired Word of God, then how are we to know which part is true and which is not? The Bible does not contain the Word of God. It is the Word of God.

The Bible is also profitable for doctrine.

The Bible is the standard by which we judge doctrines. If the Bible does not support a doctrine, we consider that doctrine to be false.

b. We believe that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God.

That is, we believe that the Bible contains no errors and that it is telling us the truth.

“Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth” (John 17:17).

The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul;
The testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple;
The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart;
The commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes;
The fear of the Lord is clean, enduring forever;
The judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.
More to be desired are they than gold,
Yea, than much fine gold;
Sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb.
Moreover by them Your servant is warned,
And in keeping them there is great reward (Ps. 19:7-11)

Your righteousness is an everlasting righteousness,
And Your law is truth (Ps. 119:142).

You are near, O Lord,
And all Your commandments are truth (Ps. 119:151).

The entirety of Your word is truth,
And every one of Your righteous judgments endures forever (Ps. 119:160).

c. Objections

Some nonbelievers object to this belief about the Bible. They say, “You are merely arguing in a circle. You are using the Bible to prove the Bible.”

That would be true if the Bible were only one book written by one author.

The Bible is a collection of books written by 40 different human authors at different times and places.

The Scriptures we read above are simply the testimony of these authors concerning the other books of the Bible.

2 Tim. 3:16 is Paul’s testimony that the Old Testament was inspired. And Peter gives testimony that Paul’s writings are Scriptural (2 Pet. 3:15-16).

These men were simply confirming what God himself had already said about the Scriptures.

Since God inspired the writing of the Bible, he is the ultimate author of it. We know that the Bible is true because we know the author!

God knows everything (Heb. 4:13); therefore, he knows what is true and what is not.

God does not lie (Titus 1:2); therefore, if he says something is true, we can trust that it is true.

We trust that the Bible is telling us the truth because we trust that God is telling us the truth.

A second objection is, “You cannot view the Bible as authoritative because men chose which books should be in the Bible.”

From the outside, it certainly looks like men chose which books to put into the Bible. The New Testament did not achieve its final form until the fourth century. Several Church leaders offered different lists of which books were considered inspired. Athanasius, the bishop of Alexandria, was the first to list the 27 books we now have in the New Testament. He wrote that list in 367 AD.

However, these men were not deciding which books should be in the New Testament. God decided which books were inspired and which were not. The Church leaders were merely recognizing and confirming which books were inspired and therefore should be included in the New Testament.

So, how do we know which books should be in the Bible? We know because God said so. Men down through the ages have merely confirmed what God has already said.